Davis v. State

35 So. 3d 1041, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8229, 2010 WL 2330413
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 11, 2010·No. 2D09-1297·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Carson Davis appeals the order revoking his probation and the resulting sentence. We affirm the order revoking probation without discussion. The sentence imposed upon the revocation of probation was a probationary split sentence of 45.9 months’ imprisonment followed by 16 months’ probation. Mr. Davis was convicted of aggravated assault, a third-degree felony. See § 784.021, Fla. Stat. (2007). His maximum lawful sentence could not exceed 60 months. See §§ 775.082(3)(d), 948.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2007). The State concedes that the combined sentence exceeds the lawful maximum, but the parties disagree on the proper calculation of credit for the period of probation that has already been served. Accordingly, we reverse the sentence and remand this case to the trial court to impose a term of probation following the 45.9-month term of imprisonment that does not exceed the lawful maximum sentence.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and ' WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 35 So. 3d 1041, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8229, 2010 WL 2330413 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

35 So. 3d 1041 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bouie v. State
64 So. 3d 712 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)