Davis v. State

807 So. 2d 166, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1419, 2002 WL 215329
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 13, 2002·No. No. 3D01-1646·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 120 S.Ct. 673, 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000)(flight factor in determining founded suspicion); United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266, 122 S.Ct. 744, 151 L.Ed.2d 740 (2002)(all circumstances pertinent in determining founded suspicion); State v. May[167]*167nard, 783 So.2d 226 (Fla.2001); Popple v. State, 626 So.2d 185 (Fla.1993).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 807 So. 2d 166, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1419, 2002 WL 215329 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

807 So. 2d 166 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watson v. State
807 So. 2d 166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)