Davis v. State
751 So. 2d 703, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1062, 2000 WL 140452
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 2000·No. No. 4D99-3337·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a facially sufficient motion to correct sentence raising his claim regarding the constitutionality of the Gort Act. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b); State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1999); Salters v. State, 731 So.2d 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315, 317 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 751 So. 2d 703, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1062, 2000 WL 140452 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
751 So. 2d 703 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wells v. State
751 So. 2d 703 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)