Davis v. State

689 So. 2d 1298, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2756, 1997 WL 134308
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 642 So. 2d 136
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 26, 1997·No. No. 97-0646·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on the reasoning of our recent opinion in Freeman v. State, 679 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion but again certify to the supreme court the same question certified in Freeman:

IS STATE v. GRAY, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995), RETROACTIVE?

DELL, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 689 So. 2d 1298, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2756, 1997 WL 134308 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

689 So. 2d 1298 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Freeman v. State
679 So. 2d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
State v. Gray
654 So. 2d 552 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)