Davis v. State

749 So. 2d 1291, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2304, 2000 WL 256589
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 691 So. 2d 1180
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 8, 2000·No. No. 3D99-3031·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we grant John H. Davis’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus that alleged ineffective assistance of appellate counsel in connection with his direct appeal from his conviction for burglary of an unoccupied structure. As the State has conceded, Davis’s appellate counsel should have argued that the erroneous jury instruction on burglary constituted fundamental error requiring reversal. See Harrison v. State, 743 So.2d 178 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Viveros v. State, 699 So.2d 822 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). As a result of the State’s confession of error, the remaining issue raised by Davis is rendered moot. We grant the petition, reverse the conviction of burglary of an unoccupied structure, and remand for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 749 So. 2d 1291, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2304, 2000 WL 256589 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

749 So. 2d 1291 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrison v. State
743 So. 2d 178 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Viveros v. State
699 So. 2d 822 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)