Davis v. State
666 So. 2d 273, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 357, 1996 WL 14474
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 17, 1996·No. No. 94-2169·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The defendant appeals from a judgment of convictions for aggravated battery and armed robbery and from his sentence for aggravated battery. With regard to the conviction and sentence for aggravated battery, we accept the State’s proper confessions of error, and we remand for a new trial on this charge. However, as to the conviction for armed robbery, we affirm finding that the defendant’s points on appeal lack merit.
Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part; and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 666 So. 2d 273, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 357, 1996 WL 14474 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
666 So. 2d 273 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fishman v. Boldt
666 So. 2d 273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)