Davis v. State

622 So. 2d 145, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8356, 1993 WL 299491
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 569 So. 2d 1317
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 10, 1993·No. No. 91-2351·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s argument with respect to issue one is without merit. See Salas v. State, 589 So.2d 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Issues two and three are not cognizable on motion for relief from an illegal sentence. See Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and MINER, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 622 So. 2d 145, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8356, 1993 WL 299491 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

622 So. 2d 145 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Judge v. State
596 So. 2d 73 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Salas v. State
589 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)