Davis v. State

582 So. 2d 1256, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8037, 1991 WL 146629
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 5, 1991·No. No. 90-1073·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s judgment of conviction and sentence for sale of a controlled substance and possession with intent to sell are vacated and the cause is remanded for a new trial. See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); Hart v. State, 529 So.2d 811 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Smith v. State, 512 So.2d 291 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Smith v. State, 444 So.2d 542 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

WIGGINTON and WOLF, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 582 So. 2d 1256, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8037, 1991 WL 146629 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

582 So. 2d 1256 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crystal v. State
616 So. 2d 150 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)