Davis v. State

534 So. 2d 789, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2534, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5106, 1988 WL 122619
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 18, 1988·No. No. 87-1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Davis appeals the summary denial of his motion pursuant to Rule 3.850, Fla.R. Crim.P. alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Although the trial judge states in his final order that certain portions of the record conclusively showing that Davis is entitled to no relief are attached thereto, no such attachment was made nor do the enumerated documents appear elsewhere in the record now before this court. We therefore reverse the order denying Davis’s motion and remand for either attachment of those portions of the record conclusively showing no entitlement to relief or for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 3.850.

Reversed and remanded.

SMITH, C.J., and NIMMONS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 534 So. 2d 789, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2534, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5106, 1988 WL 122619 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

534 So. 2d 789 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COMM. v. Dornau
534 So. 2d 789 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)