Davis v. State

371 So. 2d 491, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14419
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 346 So. 2d 141
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 1979·No. No. 78-1760·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant in a violation of probation matter. Defendant’s probation was violated on the basis of an affidavit charging several substantive offenses. We find no error in regard to the violations found in this respect. Defendant also challenges a finding that he was in violation of his probation for having failed to pay the cost of supervision. In accordance with Depson v. State, 363 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), and Murrell v. State, 364 So.2d 96 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), the finding re cost of supervision is stricken because there was no evidence or finding that the defendant had the ability to pay. The provision re cost of supervision is therefore stricken and the judgment below is affirmed in all other respects.

ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., and DAKAN, STEPHEN LEE, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 371 So. 2d 491, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14419 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

371 So. 2d 491 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Depson v. State
363 So. 2d 43 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Murrell v. State
364 So. 2d 96 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)