Davis v. State

341 So. 2d 1052, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15007
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7062
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 1977·No. No. 76-652·Published

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

The evidence clearly indicates the guilt of the Defendant, and the Appellant did not argue the sufficiency of the evidence in the brief. Had the evidence not been so clear to indicate that the jury was not misled into an erroneous verdict the comments of the prosecutor should have warranted a new trial or reversal. He said, “Ladies and gentlemen, we are all grownups and we know and I know you all know that sometimes people commit perjury on the witness stand. And I submit to you that it’s more often from the Defense side than it is from the State’s side.” There was no evidence in the record to support this last statement. This statement goes much deeper than mere argument and should be discouraged.

AFFIRM.

MAGER, C. J., and ALDERMAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 341 So. 2d 1052, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15007 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

341 So. 2d 1052 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.