Davis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided November 26, 2018·No. 16-774·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: October 31, 2018

* * * * * * * * * * * * * WENDELL DAVIS, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 16-774V * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Joint Stipulation; Hepatitis A; Tetanus- AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Diphtheria-Acellular Pertussis * (“TDaP”); Macrophagic Myofasciitis Respondent. * (“MMF”). * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Jeffrey S. Pop, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner. Voris E. Johnson, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

On June 29, 2016, Wendell Davis (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program2 for injuries allegedly related to his receipt of Hepatitis A and tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“TDaP”) vaccinations, which are contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a). Petitioner received the Hepatitis A and TDaP vaccinations on August 13, 2014. Petitioner alleged that as a result of these vaccines, he suffered from macrophagic myofasciitis (“MMF”) and that he experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than six months.

On October 31, 2018, respondent filed a joint stipulation providing that a decision should be entered awarded compensation to petitioner. Joint Stipulation (ECF No. 68). Respondent denies that the Hepatitis A and/ or TDaP vaccines or any other vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from MMF or any other injury, or his current condition. Id. at ¶ 6.

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012). The court’s website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. Before the decision is posted on the court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). “An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the decision.” Id. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the decision will be posted on the court’s website. Id. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. Maintaining their respective positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding compensation to petitioner according to the terms of the joint stipulation attached hereto as Appendix A.

The joint stipulation awards:

a. A lump sum of $1,150,000.00 (which amount represents compensation for first-year life care expenses, past and future lost earnings, past unreimbursed expenses, and pain and suffering) in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Wendell Davis; and

b. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10 of the joint stipulation attached hereto as Appendix A, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased.

These amounts represent all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(a).

I find the stipulation reasonable and I adopt it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties jointly or separately filing notice renouncing their right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ____________________________________ ) WENDELL DAVIS, ) ) Petitioner, ) v. ) ) No. 16-774V SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) Special Master Gowen AND HUMAN SERVICES ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________)

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Wendell Davis (“petitioner”) filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the “Vaccine

Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt

of Hepatitis A and tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) which vaccines are contained

in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received the Hepatitis A and Tdap immunizations on August 13, 2014. 1

3. The vaccinations were administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that he suffered from Macrophagic Myofasciitis (“MMF”) as a result

of receiving the Hepatitis A and Tdap vaccines, and further alleges that he experienced the

residual effects of this condition for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

1 As alleged in the petition, petitioner also received Meningitis, Typhoid, and Yellow Fever vaccines on August 13, 2014, and an influenza vaccine on September 12, 2014, but those vaccines are not alleged to have caused petitioner’s injury, and the Typhoid and Yellow Fever vaccines are not contained on the Vaccine injury Table. for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition.

6. Respondent denies that the Hepatitis A and/or Tdap vaccines or any other vaccine

caused petitioner to suffer from MMF or any other injury, or his current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payments:

a. A lump sum of $1,150,000.00, which amount represents compensation for first year life care expenses, past and future lost earnings, past unreimbursed expenses, and pain and suffering, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Wendell Davis; and,

b.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2018).

Davis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Davis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a