Davis v. NH DOC

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided September 6, 1994·No. 94-1304·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion


[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 94-1304

ERIC DAVIS,
Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CLASSIFICATION
BOARD, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Martin F. Loughlin, Senior U.S. District Judge]
__________________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge,
___________
Cyr and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Eric Davis on brief pro se.
__________
Jeffrey R. Howard, Attorney General, and Lucy C. Hodder,
___________________ _________________
Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.

____________________

September 2, 1994
____________________

Per Curiam. Because the order from which plaintiff
___________

seeks to appeal is not a "final decision" under 28 U.S.C.

1291, because no certification under 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) has

been granted, and because no other basis for interlocutory

appeal exists, the appeal is dismissed for lack of

jurisdiction.

Dismissed.
__________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. NH DOC, (1st Cir. 1994).

Davis v. NH DOC (Davis v. NH DOC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.