Davis v. NH DOC
This text of 34 F.3d 1065 (Davis v. NH DOC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
Eric DAVIS, Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CLASSIFICATION
BOARD, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees.
No. 94-1304
United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.
September 2, 1994
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire [Hon. Martin F. Loughlin, Senior U.S. District Judge ]
Eric Davis on brief pro se.
Jeffrey R. Howard, Attorney General, and Lucy C. Hodder, Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.
D.N.H.
DISMISSED.
Before Torruella, Chief Judge, Cyr and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam.
Because the order from which plaintiff seeks to appeal is not a "final decision" under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291, because no certification under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) has been granted, and because no other basis for interlocutory appeal exists, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 F.3d 1065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-nh-doc-ca1-1994.