Davis v. Nelson

285 F.2d 214, 1961 A.M.C. 894
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 21, 1960·No. No. 8197·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Court dismissed, for laches, the libel of the present appellant, a longshoreman who sustained injuries in 1949, but did not bring his action against the ship until 1956.

As this delay of nearly seven years exceeds any possibly applicable limitations period, it became the duty of the libellant to plead and prove facts negativing a presumption of prejudice from inexcusable delay. The presumption would be against prejudice if suit had been brought during the legal period of limitations. No allegations were made in the libel in an effort to illuminate the issue, but the court held a hearing, at which there was no showing sufficient to excuse or justify the delay, or to negative prejudice.

For the reasons stated in the District Court’s opinion, 190 F.Supp. 137, the order of dismissal is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Nelson, 285 F.2d 214, 1961 A.M.C. 894 (4th Cir. 1960).

285 F.2d 214 (Davis v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boster v. TIAA, FSB
S.D. West Virginia, 2018
Randall v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore
512 F. Supp. 150 (D. Maryland, 1981)
William Alfred Giddens v. Isbrandtsen Co., Inc.
355 F.2d 125 (Fourth Circuit, 1966)
Muse v. Freeman
197 F. Supp. 67 (E.D. Virginia, 1961)
Dawson v. Fernley & Eger
196 F. Supp. 816 (E.D. Virginia, 1961)
Davis v. Nelson
285 F.2d 214 (Fourth Circuit, 1960)