Davis v. Mundy
This text of 162 A. 717 (Davis v. Mundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On March. 17, 1930, judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff in a. suit to recover damages resulting from a collision of two automobiles. On March 6, 1931, an attachment execution was issued thereon against the Employers Reinsurance Corporation of Kansas City, as garnishee, and answers to interrogatories were made, admitting certain matters, but denying liability. A rule for judgment against the garnishee on its answers was entered. The court discharged the. rule. The plaintiff appealed.
The order of the court is interlocutory, and we cannot consider it. The order is not appealable. Brendlinger v. Riegel, 37 Pa. Superior Ct. 474; Quaker City National Bank v. Brooks, 296 Pa. 501.
The appeal is quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 A. 717, 106 Pa. Super. 486, 1932 Pa. Super. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-mundy-pasuperct-1932.