Brendlinger v. Riegel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Brendlinger v. Riegel

37 Pa. Super. 474, 1908 Pa. Super. LEXIS 314

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 7, 1908

DocketAppeal, No. 138

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 37 Pa. Super. 474 (Brendlinger v. Riegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brendlinger v. Riegel, 37 Pa. Super. 474, 1908 Pa. Super. LEXIS 314 (Pa. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order dismissing his rule for judgment against the garnishee on his answers to interrogatories. The appellee’s, counsel move to quash the appeal upon the ground that the order is in no sense a- definitive decree and no judgment was entered upon it. It is a mere interlocutory order from which an independent appeal will not lie. The motion is well taken, and for the reason suggested, the appeal is quashed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order dismissing his rule for judgment against the garnishee on his answers to interrogatories. The appellee’s, counsel move to quash the appeal upon the ground that the order is in no sense a- definitive decree and no judgment was entered upon it. It is a mere interlocutory order from which an independent appeal will not lie. The motion is well taken, and for the reason suggested, the appeal is quashed at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Pa. Super. 474, 1908 Pa. Super. LEXIS 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brendlinger-v-riegel-pasuperct-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack