Davis v. MOURAR
This text of 173 A.2d 798 (Davis v. MOURAR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Davis
v.
Mourar (et al., Appellants).
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Before ERVIN, WOODSIDE, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, and FLOOD, JJ. (RHODES, P.J., and WRIGHT, J., absent).
*92 Gerald J. Haas, Associate Counsel, State Workmen's Insurance Fund, with him E.S. Lawhorne, Associate Counsel, R.D. Holahan, Counsel, State Workmen's Insurance Fund, Marshall Seidman, Deputy Attorney General, and Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General, for State Workmen's Insurance Fund, appellant.
Kenneth Syken, with him Mazer and Syken, for appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, September 12, 1961:
The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County is affirmed on the opinion of Judge WM. R. TOAL for the court below, reported at 24 Pa. D. & C. 2d 689.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 A.2d 798, 196 Pa. Super. 91, 1961 Pa. Super. LEXIS 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-mourar-pasuperct-1961.