Davis v. Meese
This text of 865 F.2d 592 (Davis v. Meese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
865 F.2d 592
48 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1894, 1 A.D. Cases 1418
DAVIS, Joel R., on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
v.
MEESE, Edwin III, Individually and in his capacity as the
Attorney General of the United States,
Webster, William H., Individually and in his capacity as
Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
and the United States of America.
Appeal of Joel R. DAVIS.
No. 88-1687.
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Argued Jan. 10, 1989.
Decided Jan. 27, 1989.
Stephen F. Gold (Argued), Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
Vaughan Finn (Argued), U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ.Div., Washington, D.C., Virginia R. Powel, Asst. U.S. Atty., U.S. Atty's. Office, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, COWEN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Van Artstalen, reported at 692 F.Supp. 505 (E.D.Pa.1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
865 F.2d 592, 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1418, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 688, 48 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-meese-ca3-1989.