Davis v. Meche

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Davis v. Meche

204 So. 2d 596

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedNovember 29, 1967

DocketNo. 2150

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 204 So. 2d 596 (Davis v. Meche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Meche, 204 So. 2d 596 (La. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

HOOD, Judge.

This is an action for damages instituted by Mrs. Mary Laudin Davis, individually and as Natural Tutrix for her minor son, Edward Davis, against Norbert Meche. It is a companion to the case of Roberts v. Meche et al., 204 So.2d 592, which we are deciding on this date.

For the reasons which we assigned in the companion suit filed by Oliver Roberts, Jr., the judgment appealed from in the instant suit is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff-appellant.

Affirmed.

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOOD, Judge.

This is an action for damages instituted by Mrs. Mary Laudin Davis, individually and as Natural Tutrix for her minor son, Edward Davis, against Norbert Meche. It is a companion to the case of Roberts v. Meche et al., 204 So.2d 592, which we are deciding on this date.

For the reasons which we assigned in the companion suit filed by Oliver Roberts, Jr., the judgment appealed from in the instant suit is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff-appellant.

Affirmed.

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 So. 2d 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-meche-lactapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack