Davis v. Inhabitants of Charlton

5 N.E. 473, 140 Mass. 422, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 55
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 6, 1886·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

W. Allen, J.

The notice, in stating that the injury occurred by reason of a pile of timber and a pile of hay, sufficiently stated the “ cause of the injury,” although the timber alone constituted or caused the defect in the way. Pub. Sts. e. 52, § 19. St. 1882," c. 36.

It is argued that there was no evidence that the way was defective; and that, for that reason, the court should have ruled that the plaintiff could not recover. The pile of timber Was so near to the travelled path, and so situated with relation to it, that the court could not rule, as matter of law, that it did not render the road unsafe and defective. There was evidence that the way was defective, proper to submit to the jury. Snow v. Adams, 1 Cush. 443. Coggswell v. Lexington, 4 Cush. 307. Warner v. Holyoke, 112 Mass. 362. Barnes v. Chicopee, 138 Mass. 67.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Inhabitants of Charlton, 5 N.E. 473, 140 Mass. 422, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 55 (Mass. 1886).

5 N.E. 473 (Davis v. Inhabitants of Charlton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bonner v. Town of Bellingham
5 Mass. L. Rptr. 199 (Massachusetts Superior Court, 1996)
Whittington v. County Court of Jefferson County
90 S.E. 821 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1916)
Stoliker v. City of Boston
90 N.E. 927 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Tilton v. Inhabitants of Wenham
52 N.E. 514 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Cavin v. City of Brooklyn
24 Abb. N. Cas. 279 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)