Davis v. Hart

37 P. 486, 103 Cal. 530, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 817
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 13, 1894
DocketNo. 19401
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 37 P. 486 (Davis v. Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Hart, 37 P. 486, 103 Cal. 530, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 817 (Cal. 1894).

Opinion

Fitzgerald, J.

There is no brief on file by respondent, nor was the case orally argued in his behalf. ■

As the record shows that the findings are attacked by the specifications on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support them, it follows on the authority of Richter v. Fresno Canal etc. Co., 101 Cal. 582, that the judgment and order appealed from should be reversed.

So ordered.

McFarland, J., and De Haven, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. Scott
222 Cal. App. 2d 718 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)
Duisenberg-Wichman & Co. v. Johnson
7 P.2d 1081 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
Lutz v. Merchants Nat. Bank
177 P. 158 (California Supreme Court, 1918)
Bullock v. Bullock
155 P. 1009 (California Court of Appeal, 1916)
Rudd v. Wilson
1912 OK 147 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Butler v. McSpadden
1910 OK 5 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)
Nettograph Machine Co. v. Brown and Trueblood
1907 OK 83 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1907)
Contra Costa Water Co. v. Breed
73 P. 189 (California Supreme Court, 1903)
Kelly v. Bradbury
37 P. 872 (California Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 P. 486, 103 Cal. 530, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-hart-cal-1894.