Davis v. Hart
This text of 37 P. 486 (Davis v. Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no brief on file by respondent, nor was the case orally argued in his behalf. ■
As the record shows that the findings are attacked by the specifications on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support them, it follows on the authority of Richter v. Fresno Canal etc. Co., 101 Cal. 582, that the judgment and order appealed from should be reversed.
So ordered.
McFarland, J., and De Haven, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 P. 486, 103 Cal. 530, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-hart-cal-1894.