Bullock v. Bullock

155 P. 1009, 29 Cal. App. 463, 1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 206
California Court of Appeal·Decided January 24, 1916·No. Civ. No. 1480.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appellant filed her brief in the supreme court on the thirty-first day of August, 1914. The cause was thereafter transferred to this court and came on regularly for hearing on the nineteenth day of this month. Respondent has never filed any brief, either in the supreme or this court nor did he appear at the oral argument. He was regularly served with notice that on said nineteenth day of January, 1916, appellant would move this court "for an order reversing the order appealed from without consideration of the cause upon its merits . . . upon the ground that respondent has not filed his points and authorities herein." As stated, there was no appearance by respondent. *Page 464

The order appealed from is therefore reversed on the authority of Richter v. Fresno Canal Irr. Co., 101 Cal. 582, [36 P. 96]; Davis v. Hart, 103 Cal. 530, [37 P. 486]; Kelly v. Bradbury, 104 Cal. 237, [37 P. 872].

Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bullock v. Bullock, 155 P. 1009, 29 Cal. App. 463, 1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 206 (Cal. Ct. App. 1916).

155 P. 1009 (Bullock v. Bullock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. Scott
222 Cal. App. 2d 718 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)
Duisenberg-Wichman & Co. v. Johnson
7 P.2d 1081 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
Lutz v. Merchants Nat. Bank
177 P. 158 (California Supreme Court, 1918)