Davis v. Federal Mortgage Co.

111 S.W.2d 1066
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. Federal Mortgage Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Tex. 46
Texas Supreme Court·Decided January 12, 1938·No. No. 7234·Published

Opinion

MARTIN, Commissioner.

This is a usury case. The precise contract, before us has already been the subject of opinions by three different Courts of Civil Appeals. See Bohannan v. First National Bank, 85 S.W.2d 989, Federal Mortgage Co. et al. v. Hawkins, 95 S.W.2d 744, and Federal Mortgage Co. et al. v. Davis, 100 S.W.2d 717. It is our opinion that the Dallas Court of Civil Appeals in the present case correctly held the contract untainted by usury. Federal Mortgage Co. v. Davis, supra. To here restate and re-discuss a question already plainly and correctly decided would be to burden the bench and bar with a wholly unnecessary opinion.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Federal Mortgage Co., 111 S.W.2d 1066 (Tex. 1938).

111 S.W.2d 1066 (Davis v. Federal Mortgage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Federal Mortgage Co. v. Hawkins
95 S.W.2d 744 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Bohannan v. First Nat. Bank in Dallas
85 S.W.2d 989 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Federal Mortg. Co. v. Davis
100 S.W.2d 717 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)