Davis v. Federal Mortgage Co.
This text of 111 S.W.2d 1066 (Davis v. Federal Mortgage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a usury case. The precise contract, before us has already been the subject of opinions by three different Courts of Civil Appeals. See Bohannan v. First National Bank, 85 S.W.2d 989, Federal Mortgage Co. et al. v. Hawkins, 95 S.W.2d 744, and Federal Mortgage Co. et al. v. Davis, 100 S.W.2d 717. It is our opinion that the Dallas Court of Civil Appeals in the present case correctly held the contract untainted by usury. Federal Mortgage Co. v. Davis, supra. To here restate and re-discuss a question already plainly and correctly decided would be to burden the bench and bar with a wholly unnecessary opinion.
The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.
Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 S.W.2d 1066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-federal-mortgage-co-tex-1938.