Davis v. Davis

601 F.2d 153
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 1979·No. No. 77-1782·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The petitioner was prosecuted in a court of the Commonwealth of Virginia upon charges of possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute and its distribution. Upon conviction, although less than nine ounces of marijuana were involved in the offenses, the court imposed a fine of $20,000 and a sentence of imprisonment of forty years. The district court concluded that the penalties imposed were so disproportionate to the offenses as to amount to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. On that basis, a writ of habeas corpus was awarded, and the Commonwealth of Virginia has appealed.

We affirm for reasons sufficiently stated by the district judge in his opinion. 432 F.Supp. 444 (W.D.Va.1977). This action supersedes the panel opinion. 585 F.2d 1226 (4th Cir. 1978).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Davis, 601 F.2d 153 (4th Cir. 1979).

601 F.2d 153 (Davis v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Davis
530 A.2d 1223 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1987)
Hutto v. Davis
454 U.S. 370 (Supreme Court, 1982)
John Paul Jones, Jr. v. K. R. Purvis
646 F.2d 127 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)
State v. Smith
610 P.2d 869 (Washington Supreme Court, 1980)
Rummel v. Estelle
445 U.S. 263 (Supreme Court, 1980)
Wolkind v. Selph
473 F. Supp. 675 (E.D. Virginia, 1979)
Davis v. Davis
601 F.2d 153 (Fourth Circuit, 1979)