Davis-Elliott v. New York City Department of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davis-Elliott v. New York City Department of Education

31 A.D.3d 266, 817 N.Y.S.2d 498

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 6, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.3d 266 (Davis-Elliott v. New York City Department of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis-Elliott v. New York City Department of Education, 31 A.D.3d 266, 817 N.Y.S.2d 498 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered November 9, 2004, which granted the petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding to annul a determination of respondent Department of Education, dated August 25, 2003, rejecting petitioner’s application for employment, to the extent of directing respondents to reinstate petitioner to the position she held prior to her termination, or to an equivalent position, with back pay and benefits, and denied respondents’ cross motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously modified, on the law, the grant of relief to petitioner vacated, and otherwise affirmed, without costs, and the matter remanded to permit respondents to interpose an answer to the petition within 20 days of service upon them of a copy of this order with notice of entry and for further proceedings.

The IAS court properly denied respondents’ cross motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. The petition sufficiently alleges that the rejection was unlawful in the manner in which respondents considered the factors set forth in Correction Law § 753 (see e.g. Matter of Marra v City of White Plains, 96 AD2d 17 [1983]; cf. Matter of Arrocha v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 93 NY2d 361 [1999]). The court erred, however, in making a determination on the merits without affording respondents an opportunity to answer the petition (CPLR 7804 [f]; Matter of Nassau BOCES Cent. Council of Teachers v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs. of Nassau County, 63 NY2d 100 [1984]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered November 9, 2004, which granted the petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding to annul a determination of respondent Department of Education, dated August 25, 2003, rejecting petitioner’s application for employment, to the extent of directing respondents to reinstate petitioner to the position she held prior to her termination, or to an equivalent position, with back pay and benefits, and denied respondents’ cross motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously modified, on the law, the grant of relief to petitioner vacated, and otherwise affirmed, without costs, and the matter remanded to permit respondents to interpose an answer to the petition within 20 days of service upon them of a copy of this order with notice of entry and for further proceedings.

The IAS court properly denied respondents’ cross motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. The petition sufficiently alleges that the rejection was unlawful in the manner in which respondents considered the factors set forth in Correction Law § 753 (see e.g. Matter of Marra v City of White Plains, 96 AD2d 17 [1983]; cf. Matter of Arrocha v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 93 NY2d 361 [1999]). The court erred, however, in making a determination on the merits without affording respondents an opportunity to answer the petition (CPLR 7804 [f]; Matter of Nassau BOCES Cent. Council of Teachers v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs. of Nassau County, 63 NY2d 100 [1984]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.3d 266, 817 N.Y.S.2d 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-elliott-v-new-york-city-department-of-education-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack