Davies v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 454
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davies v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 49 Cust. Ct. 296
United States Customs Court·Decided May 21, 1962·No. No. 66773; protests 61/6652, etc. (Philadelphia)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of HO equipment similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al. (47 C.C.P.A. 137, C.A.D. 746), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” at 13% percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), for other metal articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device and the items marked “B” at the appropriate rate of duty, depending upon the date of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108), for manufactures in chief value of base metal, not specially provided for, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davies v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 454 (cusc 1962).

48 Cust. Ct. 454 (Davies v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Polk's Model Craft Hobbies, Inc.
47 C.C.P.A. 137 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1960)