Davies v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Davies v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 454

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 21, 1962

DocketNo. 66773; protests 61/6652, etc. (Philadelphia)

StatusPublished

This text of 48 Cust. Ct. 454 (Davies v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davies v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 454 (cusc 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of HO equipment similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al. (47 C.C.P.A. 137, C.A.D. 746), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” at 13% percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), for other metal articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device and the items marked “B” at the appropriate rate of duty, depending upon the date of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108), for manufactures in chief value of base metal, not specially provided for, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of HO equipment similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al. (47 C.C.P.A. 137, C.A.D. 746), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” at 13% percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), for other metal articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device and the items marked “B” at the appropriate rate of duty, depending upon the date of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108), for manufactures in chief value of base metal, not specially provided for, as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 Cust. Ct. 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davies-v-united-states-cusc-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack