Davies v. State
This text of 2020 ND 128 (Davies v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 6/2/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2020 ND 128
Hutchingson Chuchu Davies, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
Nos. 20190340, 20190341, 20190342
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Stephannie N. Stiel, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
SheraLynn Ternes, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief. Davies v. State Nos. 20190340, 20190341, 20190342
[¶1] Hutchingson Chuchu Davies appeals from a district court judgment denying his application for post-conviction relief. Following a post-conviction hearing, the court found Davies failed to satisfy the Strickland test for ineffective assistance of counsel. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). The court did not clearly err in denying Davies’ application for post- conviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Gerald W. VandeWalle Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 ND 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davies-v-state-nd-2020.