Davidson v. Stringer

District Court, E.D. Missouri·Decided June 3, 2021·No. 4:20-cv-01478·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION DEAN BRYAN DAVIDSON, ) Plaintiff, Vv. No. 4:20-cv-01478-DDN MARK STRINGER, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Docket No. 14). When this Court dismissed plaintiffs case, it certified in writing that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) (providing that “[a]n appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith”). It is not apparent that plaintiff now seeks appellate review of any issue that is not frivolous. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962) (explaining that “good faith” is “judged by an objective standard,” and that it is “demonstrated when [plaintiff] seeks appellate review of any issue not frivolous”). The Court will therefore deny the motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Docket No. 14) is DENIED.

RONNIE L. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated this 3rd day of June, 2021.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davidson v. Stringer, (E.D. Mo. 2021).

Davidson v. Stringer (Davidson v. Stringer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)