Davidson v. Bancroft
This text of 560 A.2d 13 (Davidson v. Bancroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bancroft & Martin, the employer, appeals from a decision of the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Commission affirming the Commissioner’s order denying a petition for review of incapacity. The employer argues that the Appellate Division erred in denying the petition in circumstances where at least a portion of the employee’s present incapacity results from a disease process unrelated to his former employment. In a case such as this, the employer is charged with the burden of proving that the work-related injury is no longer a causative factor in producing the employee’s incapacity. Brackett v. A.C. Lawrence Leather Co., 559 A.2d 776 (Me.1989). The record before us does not compel such a finding.
The entry is:
The decision of the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Commission is affirmed.
It is ordered that the employer pay to the employee $750 for his counsel fees plus his reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for this appeal.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
560 A.2d 13, 1989 Me. LEXIS 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-bancroft-me-1989.