David v. Peninsular Building Supply Co.
This text of 481 So. 2d 511 (David v. Peninsular Building Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The most important question argued on this appeal is whether appellant stipulated for the case to be tried nonjury. However, despite an apparent misunderstanding on the part of the judge, our examination of the record reflects that appellant never made demand for a jury trial on his defenses to the lien foreclosure or on his counterclaim. Consequently, appellant’s reliance upon Hightower v. Bigoney, 156 So.2d 501 (Fla.1963), is misplaced.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
481 So. 2d 511, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 70, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-v-peninsular-building-supply-co-fladistctapp-1985.