David Rodriguez v. Richard R. Storm Jr. H-E-B, LP, Law Office of Shelton & Valadez Mark A. Giltner William Tate And Stephen Martinez

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 1, 2020·No. 04-19-00642-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 1, 2020

No. 04-19-00642-CV

David RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

v.

Richard R. STORM Jr.; H-E-B, LP, Law office of Shelton & Valadez; Mark A. Giltner; William Tate; and Stephen Martinez, Appellees

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019-CI-13590 Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s reply brief was due on March 20, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(c). Before the due date, Appellant filed a first motion for a thirty-day extension of time to file the reply brief. On March 31, 2020, Appellant filed his reply brief. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s reply brief is deemed timely filed.

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 1st day of April, 2020.

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Rodriguez v. Richard R. Storm Jr. H-E-B, LP, Law Office of Shelton & Valadez Mark A. Giltner William Tate And Stephen Martinez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

David Rodriguez v. Richard R. Storm Jr. H-E-B, LP, Law Office of Shelton & Valadez Mark A. Giltner William Tate And Stephen Martinez (David Rodriguez v. Richard R. Storm Jr. H-E-B, LP, Law Office of Shelton & Valadez Mark A. Giltner William Tate And Stephen Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.