David Rodriguez v. Richard R. Storm Jr. H-E-B, LP, Law Office of Shelton & Valadez Mark A. Giltner William Tate And Stephen Martinez

Court of Appeals of Texas

David Rodriguez v. Richard R. Storm Jr. H-E-B, LP, Law Office of Shelton & Valadez Mark A. Giltner William Tate And Stephen Martinez

DecidedMarch 19, 2020

Docket04-19-00642-CV

StatusPublished

This text of David Rodriguez v. Richard R. Storm Jr. H-E-B, LP, Law Office of Shelton & Valadez Mark A. Giltner William Tate And Stephen Martinez (David Rodriguez v. Richard R. Storm Jr. H-E-B, LP, Law Office of Shelton & Valadez Mark A. Giltner William Tate And Stephen Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David Rodriguez v. Richard R. Storm Jr. H-E-B, LP, Law Office of Shelton & Valadez Mark A. Giltner William Tate And Stephen Martinez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 19, 2020

No. 04-19-00642-CV & 04-19-00795 CV

David RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

v.

Richard R. STORM Jr.; H-E-B, LP, Law office of Shelton & Valadez; Mark A. Giltner; William Tate; and Stephen Martinez, Appellees

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019-CI-13590, 2019CI16263 Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

ORDER The causes underlying appeals numbered 04-19-00642-CV and 04-19-00795-CV both stem from a purported injury Appellant’s wife sustained while employed with H-E-B. Appellees H-E-B, LP, Shelton & Valadez, P.C., Mark A. Giltner, William Tate, and Stephen Martinez filed an Advisory to the Court Regarding Related Appeals. The advisory suggests that the two appeals should be consolidated. The Appellant’s and Appellees’ briefs have been filed in both appeals. Having considered the suggestion, we conclude that the appeals should be consolidated for all remaining briefs and any oral argument. Because appeal number 04-19-00795-CV is an accelerated appeal, we will also apply the accelerated appeal timetable and procedures to appeal number 04-19-00642-CV. The parties shall file all motions, any remaining briefs, and other documents as if the two appeals were one case, but the parties shall include both appeal numbers with the styles of the cases. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.3(a). The records for the two appeals shall remain separate. If the appeals are submitted on oral argument, both appeals shall be argued together as a single appeal; the court will decide the total time limit for each side. See id. R. 39.3. The court will dispose of the two appeals with one judgment, opinion, and mandate. _________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 19th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 19, 2020

No. 04-19-00642-CV & 04-19-00795 CV

David RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

v.

Richard R. STORM Jr.; H-E-B, LP, Law office of Shelton & Valadez; Mark A. Giltner; William Tate; and Stephen Martinez, Appellees

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019-CI-13590, 2019CI16263 Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

ORDER The causes underlying appeals numbered 04-19-00642-CV and 04-19-00795-CV both stem from a purported injury Appellant’s wife sustained while employed with H-E-B. Appellees H-E-B, LP, Shelton & Valadez, P.C., Mark A. Giltner, William Tate, and Stephen Martinez filed an Advisory to the Court Regarding Related Appeals. The advisory suggests that the two appeals should be consolidated. The Appellant’s and Appellees’ briefs have been filed in both appeals. Having considered the suggestion, we conclude that the appeals should be consolidated for all remaining briefs and any oral argument. Because appeal number 04-19-00795-CV is an accelerated appeal, we will also apply the accelerated appeal timetable and procedures to appeal number 04-19-00642-CV. The parties shall file all motions, any remaining briefs, and other documents as if the two appeals were one case, but the parties shall include both appeal numbers with the styles of the cases. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.3(a). The records for the two appeals shall remain separate. If the appeals are submitted on oral argument, both appeals shall be argued together as a single appeal; the court will decide the total time limit for each side. See id. R. 39.3. The court will dispose of the two appeals with one judgment, opinion, and mandate. _________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 19th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

David Rodriguez v. Richard R. Storm Jr. H-E-B, LP, Law Office of Shelton & Valadez Mark A. Giltner William Tate And Stephen Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-rodriguez-v-richard-r-storm-jr-h-e-b-lp-law-office-of-shelton-texapp-2020.