David Rodefer Oil Co. v. Commissioner
This text of 11 B.T.A. 782 (David Rodefer Oil Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[783]*783OPINION.
The petitioner claims the right to have its net income for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1917, determined upon the basis of inventories of oil on hand at the beginning and close of the year, taken on the basis of market value regardless of cost. In United States v. Kemp, 12 Fed. (2d) 7, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that a taxpayer could not value his inventory at market if higher than cost regardless of custom for the years 1917, 1918, and 1919. Writ of certiorari was denied by the United States Supreme Court, 273 U. S. 703. To the same effect see F. N. Johnson Co., 2 B T. A. 256. The petitioner’s net income and invested capital for the taxable year under review should be determined upon the basis of inventories based on cost which are found to be $10,242.16 as of June 1, 1916, and $2,903.91 as of May 31, 1917.
The petitioner claims that the collection of the deficiency determined by the Commissionei for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1917, is barred by the statute of limitations. The facts in this case are parallel to those considered by the Board in G. L. Ramsey, 11 B. T. A. 345. In accordance therewith the deficiency assessment is collectible.
Judgment will be entered on lb days’ notice, under Rule 50.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 B.T.A. 782, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-rodefer-oil-co-v-commissioner-bta-1928.