David McDonald and Mary Kay McDonald v. Credithrift of America, Inc.

661 F.2d 69, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16086
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 12, 1981·No. 80-7900·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The sole question presented in this matter is the propriety of the awarding of attor[70] ney’s fees to the prevailing plaintiff in a Truth in Lending Act case for the legal services rendered in both prosecuting the TILA claim and in successfully defending a state law counterclaim (money due and owing to defendant under the note). Convinced that this ruling is controlled by the recent decision of our court in Lacy v. General Finance Corporation, 651 F.2d 1026 (5th Cir. 1981), we remand to the district court for the vacating of any attorney’s fees awarded for services in connection with the defending of the counterclaim.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David McDonald and Mary Kay McDonald v. Credithrift of America, Inc., 661 F.2d 69, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16086 (5th Cir. 1981).

661 F.2d 69 (David McDonald and Mary Kay McDonald v. Credithrift of America, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related