David Keith Barron v. State
Opinion
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-17-00270-CR
DAVID KEITH BARRON, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 443rd District Court Ellis County, Texas
Trial Court No. 41187CR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant David Keith Barron was convicted of driving while intoxicated, a third or more offense, and sentenced to six years in prison. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 49.04; 49.09. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.
In two issues, Barron contends that his six-year sentence was grossly disproportionate to the crime and inappropriate to the offender under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 13 of the Texas Constitution. See U.S. CONST. amend. VIII; see also TEX. CONST. art. I, § 13.
A disproportionate-sentence claim must be preserved for appellate review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 33(a)(1); Rhoades v. State, 934 S.W.2d 113, 120 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (en banc); Mercado v. State, 718 S.W.2d 291, 296 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986) (en banc); see also Noland v. State, 264 S.W.3d 144, 151 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. ref’d). At trial, Barron did not object to the imposed sentence. Further, Barron did not raise a disproportionate-sentence claim in his motion for new trial or otherwise present a post- trial objection to the imposed sentence. Thus, Barron’s complaints in these two issues are not preserved and are overruled.
Having overruled Barron’s issues on appeal, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
REX D. DAVIS
Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Affirmed Opinion delivered and filed May 22, 2019 Do not publish [CR25]
Barron v. State Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David Keith Barron v. State (David Keith Barron v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.