David Jeep v. Jack Bennett

295 F. App'x 866
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 10, 2008
Docket08-1823
StatusUnpublished

This text of 295 F. App'x 866 (David Jeep v. Jack Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Jeep v. Jack Bennett, 295 F. App'x 866 (8th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Jeep appeals the district court’s 1 orders dismissing his claims against multiple defendants and granting summary judgment to the remaining defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action. After careful review, we conclude that the orders were proper for the reasons stated by the district court and that an extended discussion is not warranted. See Maness v. Dist. Court, 495 F.3d 943, 943-44 (8th Cir.2007) (per curiam) (de novo review of dismissals based on immunity); Rouse v. Benson, 193 F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir.1999) (district court’s grant of summary judgment reviewed de novo).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny as moot Jeep’s motion for an expedited appeal.

1

. The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 F. App'x 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-jeep-v-jack-bennett-ca8-2008.