David J. Tucker v. United States
343 F.2d 305
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 7, 1965·No. Misc. 2364·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
ORDER
On consideration of petitioner’s petition for rehearing en banc and of petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel, and it appearing that a majority of the judges of this circuit are not in favor of granting petitioner’s aforesaid petition and motion, it is
ORDERED by the court that petitioner’s petition for rehearing en banc and petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel are denied.
BAZELON, Chief Judge, and FAHY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, would grant petitioner’s petition and motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David J. Tucker v. United States, 343 F.2d 305 (D.C. Cir. 1965).
343 F.2d 305 (David J. Tucker v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
David J. Tucker v. United States
427 F.2d 615 (D.C. Circuit, 1970)