David J. Tucker v. United States

D.C. Circuit

David J. Tucker v. United States

343 F.2d 305

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 7, 1965

DocketMisc. 2364

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 343 F.2d 305 (David J. Tucker v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David J. Tucker v. United States, 343 F.2d 305 (D.C. Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of petitioner’s petition for rehearing en banc and of petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel, and it appearing that a majority of the judges of this circuit are not in favor of granting petitioner’s aforesaid petition and motion, it is

ORDERED by the court that petitioner’s petition for rehearing en banc and petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel are denied.

BAZELON, Chief Judge, and FAHY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, would grant petitioner’s petition and motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI