David Fox & Sons, Inc. v. King Poultry Co., Inc.

246 N.E.2d 166, 23 N.Y.2d 914, 298 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1587
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 23, 1969·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Order modified, without costs, by directing that judgment be entered after damages have been computed in accordance with the rule laid down in the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division and, as so modified, affirmed.

Concur: Chief Judge Full and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Jasen. Taking no part: Judge Breitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Fox & Sons, Inc. v. King Poultry Co., Inc., 246 N.E.2d 166, 23 N.Y.2d 914, 298 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1587 (N.Y. 1969).

246 N.E.2d 166 (David Fox & Sons, Inc. v. King Poultry Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

E.J. Brooks Co. v. Cambridge Sec. Seals
31 N.Y.3d 441 (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)
E.J. Brooks Co. v. Cambridge Security Seals
858 F.3d 744 (Second Circuit, 2017)
Design Innovation, Inc. v. Fisher-Price, Inc.
463 F. Supp. 2d 177 (D. Connecticut, 2006)
The Topps Co., Inc. v. Cadbury Stani SAIC
380 F. Supp. 2d 250 (S.D. New York, 2005)
Hyde Park Products Corp. v. Maximilian Lerner Corp.
480 N.E.2d 1084 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)