David Fox & Sons, Inc. v. King Poultry Co., Inc.
246 N.E.2d 166, 23 N.Y.2d 914, 298 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1587
This text of 246 N.E.2d 166 (David Fox & Sons, Inc. v. King Poultry Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
David Fox & Sons, Inc. v. King Poultry Co., Inc., 246 N.E.2d 166, 23 N.Y.2d 914, 298 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1587 (N.Y. 1969).
Opinion
Order modified, without costs, by directing that judgment be entered after damages have been computed in accordance with the rule laid down in the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division and, as so modified, affirmed.
Concur: Chief Judge Full and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Jasen. Taking no part: Judge Breitel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
E.J. Brooks Co. v. Cambridge Sec. Seals
31 N.Y.3d 441 (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)
E.J. Brooks Co. v. Cambridge Sec. Seals
Second Circuit, 2017
E.J. Brooks Co. v. Cambridge Security Seals
858 F.3d 744 (Second Circuit, 2017)
Design Innovation, Inc. v. Fisher-Price, Inc.
463 F. Supp. 2d 177 (D. Connecticut, 2006)
The Topps Co., Inc. v. Cadbury Stani SAIC
380 F. Supp. 2d 250 (S.D. New York, 2005)
Softel, Inc. v. Dragon Medical And Scientific Communications, Inc.
118 F.3d 955 (Second Circuit, 1997)
Softel, Inc. v. Dragon Medical & Scientific Communications, Inc.
118 F.3d 955 (Second Circuit, 1997)
Hyde Park Products Corp. v. Maximilian Lerner Corp.
480 N.E.2d 1084 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
246 N.E.2d 166, 23 N.Y.2d 914, 298 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-fox-sons-inc-v-king-poultry-co-inc-ny-1969.