David E. Elliott, Jr., an Incapacitated Adult by and Through His Guardian, Barbara v. Elliott, Barbara v. Elliott, Individually v. United States

28 F.3d 1076, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21600, 1994 WL 390145
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 28, 1994·No. 93-8027·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION OF REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion February 15, 1994, 11th Cir., 1994, 13 F.3d 1555)

July 28, 1994.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. *

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en bane,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David E. Elliott, Jr., an Incapacitated Adult by and Through His Guardian, Barbara v. Elliott, Barbara v. Elliott, Individually v. United States, 28 F.3d 1076, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21600, 1994 WL 390145 (11th Cir. 1994).

28 F.3d 1076 (David E. Elliott, Jr., an Incapacitated Adult by and Through His Guardian, Barbara v. Elliott, Barbara v. Elliott, Individually v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cummings v. Department of the Navy
116 F. Supp. 2d 76 (District of Columbia, 2000)
Dall v. United States
42 F. Supp. 2d 1275 (M.D. Florida, 1998)