David Carl Swingle v. State
Opinion
Q5^l3-00<4ZO-GJt
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
NO. PD-0273-14
DAVID CARL SWINGLE, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS ROCKWALL COUNTY
Per curiam. Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.
ORDER
The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure
9.4(i)(2)(D) because the petition exceeds the proper length.
The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.
The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be
filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.
Filed: April 30, 2014 Do Not Publish
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
STATE OF TEXAS §3 PENALTY FOR o
o
MTNEV BOWES
RO. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION PRIVATE USE 02 ir $ 00.406 0002003152 MAY01 2014 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 Q.U.
c MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 78 701 PD-0273-14 5TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK LISA MATZ 600 COMMERCE 2ND FLOOR DALLAS TX 75202
121 DME-N3B 7S202
rilii»li--'»»tf.MfI-*f*liiI-»-*«.,fiiffitIlt-|il..*|.t|if| |.T
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David Carl Swingle v. State (David Carl Swingle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.