David Carl Swingle v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 10, 2013·No. 05-13-00430-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered October 10, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00430-CR

DAVID CARL SWINGLE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2-06-16

ORDER

The Court STRIKES the pro se brief received from appellant on October 3, 2013.

Appellant is represented by counsel and is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Rudd v.

State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981).

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Carl Swingle v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

David Carl Swingle v. State (David Carl Swingle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)