David a Maples v. State of Michigan
This text of David a Maples v. State of Michigan (David a Maples v. State of Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
October 30, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
159863 & (51) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra DAVID MAPLES, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 159863 COA: 343394 Court of Claims: 17-000135-MZ STATE OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee. _____________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion to accept the application for leave to appeal is DENIED. See MCR 7.316(B) (“The Court will not accept for filing a motion to file a late application for leave to appeal under MCR 7.305(C)[.]”). Further, because late applications will not be accepted absent circumstances not present in this case, the plaintiff’s late application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED. MCR 7.305(C)(5).
VIVIANO, J., would accept the application as timely filed.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 30, 2019 b1023 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David a Maples v. State of Michigan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-a-maples-v-state-of-michigan-mich-2019.