David a Maples v. State of Michigan

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 30, 2019·No. 159863·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

October 30, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

159863 & (51) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra DAVID MAPLES, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 159863 COA: 343394 Court of Claims: 17-000135-MZ STATE OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee. _____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to accept the application for leave to appeal is DENIED. See MCR 7.316(B) (“The Court will not accept for filing a motion to file a late application for leave to appeal under MCR 7.305(C)[.]”). Further, because late applications will not be accepted absent circumstances not present in this case, the plaintiff’s late application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED. MCR 7.305(C)(5).

VIVIANO, J., would accept the application as timely filed.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 30, 2019 b1023 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David a Maples v. State of Michigan, (Mich. 2019).

David a Maples v. State of Michigan (David a Maples v. State of Michigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.