David a Maples v. State of Michigan

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 9, 2020·No. 160740·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

October 9, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 160740(81) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein DAVID A. MAPLES, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiff-Appellant, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices SC: 160740 v COA: 343394 Ct of Claims: 17-000135-MZ STATE OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________________/

By order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant to extend the time for filing his reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on October 2, 2020, is accepted for filing.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 9, 2020

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

October 9, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

By order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant to extend the time for filing his reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on October 2, 2020, is accepted for filing.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 9, 2020

Clerk

David a Maples v. State of Michigan, (Mich. 2020).

Pincite

David a Maples v. State of Michigan (David a Maples v. State of Michigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.