Daviau v. Pozzy

419 A.2d 365, 1980 Me. LEXIS 655
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedSeptember 11, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 419 A.2d 365 (Daviau v. Pozzy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daviau v. Pozzy, 419 A.2d 365, 1980 Me. LEXIS 655 (Me. 1980).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Plaintiff, Jerome G. Daviau, an attorney, appeals from a ruling of the Superior Court, Kennebec County, purporting to grant his counsel’s motion to withdraw. The purported order merely recites: “Motion allowed upon grounds set forth in Maine Bar Rule 3.5(c)(4)(5)(8) [(3.5(c)(4), (5), (8))], counsel for plaintiff to notify plaintiff forthwith of this order.” The entry on the docket reads: “Motion to withdraw as counsel granted.”

Assuming there was an effective order, we are unable to review it since we do not have before us a record sufficient to permit *366 us to know the factual basis for the ruling of the Superior Court. “Appellant has the affirmative duty of supplying this Court with an adequate record upon which consideration can be given to the arguments advanced in support of the appeal.” Summit Realty, Inc. v. Gipe, Me., 315 A.2d 428, 429 (1974).

The entry is:

Appeal dismissed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Kerr
455 A.2d 425 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1982)
Ramsey v. Board of Appeals
451 A.2d 651 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1982)
State v. Meyer
423 A.2d 955 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
419 A.2d 365, 1980 Me. LEXIS 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daviau-v-pozzy-me-1980.