Daviau v. Pozzy

419 A.2d 365, 1980 Me. LEXIS 655
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided September 11, 1980·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Plaintiff, Jerome G. Daviau, an attorney, appeals from a ruling of the Superior Court, Kennebec County, purporting to grant his counsel’s motion to withdraw. The purported order merely recites: “Motion allowed upon grounds set forth in Maine Bar Rule 3.5(c)(4)(5)(8) [(3.5(c)(4), (5), (8))], counsel for plaintiff to notify plaintiff forthwith of this order.” The entry on the docket reads: “Motion to withdraw as counsel granted.”

Assuming there was an effective order, we are unable to review it since we do not have before us a record sufficient to permit *366 us to know the factual basis for the ruling of the Superior Court. “Appellant has the affirmative duty of supplying this Court with an adequate record upon which consideration can be given to the arguments advanced in support of the appeal.” Summit Realty, Inc. v. Gipe, Me., 315 A.2d 428, 429 (1974).

The entry is:

Appeal dismissed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daviau v. Pozzy, 419 A.2d 365, 1980 Me. LEXIS 655 (Me. 1980).

419 A.2d 365 (Daviau v. Pozzy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kerr
455 A.2d 425 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1982)
Ramsey v. Board of Appeals
451 A.2d 651 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1982)
State v. Meyer
423 A.2d 955 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1980)