Davey E. Wright v. Joane M. Tape

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 8, 2021
DocketA22D0087
StatusPublished

This text of Davey E. Wright v. Joane M. Tape (Davey E. Wright v. Joane M. Tape) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davey E. Wright v. Joane M. Tape, (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ November 01, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22D0087. DAVEY M. WRIGHT v. JOANE M. TAPE.

On September 1, 2021, the trial court entered a Family Violence Twelve Month Protective Order, in which it ordered Davey M. Wright to refrain from contact with Joane M. Tape and the parties’ eight-year-old son. Appearing pro se, Wright filed a notice of appeal, a motion for new trial, and the instant application for discretionary appeal on October 1, 2021. We lack jurisdiction. Appeals from final orders in domestic relations cases require an application for discretionary review. See Voyles v. Voyles, 301 Ga. 44, 45 (799 SE2d 160) (2017); OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). However, Wright’s motion for new trial remains pending below. Therefore, the September 1, 2021 order he seeks to challenge is not final, and Wright was required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) and obtain a certificate of immediate review from the trial judge in order to appeal the order. See Hann v. State, 292 Ga. App. 719, 720 (1) (665 SE2d 731) (2008); Drake v. Clutter, 194 Ga. App. 644, 645 (391 SE2d 473) (1990). Moreover, OCGA § 5-6-35, the discretionary appeal statute, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996). Wright’s failure to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures set forth above deprives this Court of jurisdiction over this application. Accordingly, Wright’s application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 11/01/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hann v. State
665 S.E.2d 731 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Drake v. Clutter
391 S.E.2d 473 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Bailey v. Bailey
471 S.E.2d 213 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Voyles v. Voyles
799 S.E.2d 160 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Davey E. Wright v. Joane M. Tape, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davey-e-wright-v-joane-m-tape-gactapp-2021.