Davenport v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Davenport v. City of Detroit

256 N.W. 354, 268 Mich. 374, 1934 Mich. LEXIS 804

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 18, 1934

DocketDocket No. 87, Calendar No. 137,709.

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 256 N.W. 354 (Davenport v. City of Detroit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davenport v. City of Detroit, 256 N.W. 354, 268 Mich. 374, 1934 Mich. LEXIS 804 (Mich. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Wiest, J;

In March, 1932, plaintiff was an indigent inmate of Fisher Lodge, a charity maintained by the city of Detroit for indigent single men. There he was furnished two meals a day and lodging. The meals for the inmates were provided, together with serving equipment, by the Industrial Lunch Company under contract. The lodge had accommodations for upward of 1,500 men and, to aid in serving meals and washing dishes, inmates who were willing to so work were given three meals a day and 50 cents per week. Plaintiff was willing to so work washing dishes and, while preparing a compound substitute for soap to be used in washing dishes, splashed lye in his left eye, causing blindness and removal of that eye. The accident was known to city employees in charge of the lodge but no report thereof was made to the department of labor and industry. Plaintiff applied for an award under the workmen’s compensation act (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 8407 et seq.) for loss of an eye and, upon hearing before a deputy commissioner and upon appeal to the hoard, he was granted compensation. Review is had by appeal in the nature of certiorari.

The relation was not that of employer and employee under the workmen’s compensation act.

*376 The case is ruled by our opinion in Vaivida v. City of Grand Rapids, 264 Mich. 204 (88 A. L. R. 707).

In Village of West Milwaukee v. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin, 216 Wis. 29 (255 N. W. 728), and McBurney v. Industrial Accident Commission, 220 Cal. 129 (30 Pac. [2d] 414), the Vaivida Case was cited and like holdings made.

See also Jackson v. North Carolina Emergency Relief Administration, 206 N. C. 274 (173 S. E. 580); Thomas F. Greene’s Case, 280 Mass. 506 (182 N. E. 857); Stiles v. Des Moines Council Boy Scouts of America, 209 Iowa, 1235 (229 N. W. 841).

The award is vacated, with costs to defendant.

Nelson Sharpe, C. J., and Potter, North, Pead, Butzel, Bushnell, and Edward M. Sharpe, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiest, J;

In March, 1932, plaintiff was an indigent inmate of Fisher Lodge, a charity maintained by the city of Detroit for indigent single men. There he was furnished two meals a day and lodging. The meals for the inmates were provided, together with serving equipment, by the Industrial Lunch Company under contract. The lodge had accommodations for upward of 1,500 men and, to aid in serving meals and washing dishes, inmates who were willing to so work were given three meals a day and 50 cents per week. Plaintiff was willing to so work washing dishes and, while preparing a compound substitute for soap to be used in washing dishes, splashed lye in his left eye, causing blindness and removal of that eye. The accident was known to city employees in charge of the lodge but no report thereof was made to the department of labor and industry. Plaintiff applied for an award under the workmen’s compensation act (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 8407 et seq.) for loss of an eye and, upon hearing before a deputy commissioner and upon appeal to the hoard, he was granted compensation. Review is had by appeal in the nature of certiorari.

The relation was not that of employer and employee under the workmen’s compensation act.

*376 The case is ruled by our opinion in Vaivida v. City of Grand Rapids, 264 Mich. 204 (88 A. L. R. 707).

In Village of West Milwaukee v. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin, 216 Wis. 29 (255 N. W. 728), and McBurney v. Industrial Accident Commission, 220 Cal. 129 (30 Pac. [2d] 414), the Vaivida Case was cited and like holdings made.

See also Jackson v. North Carolina Emergency Relief Administration, 206 N. C. 274 (173 S. E. 580); Thomas F. Greene’s Case, 280 Mass. 506 (182 N. E. 857); Stiles v. Des Moines Council Boy Scouts of America, 209 Iowa, 1235 (229 N. W. 841).

The award is vacated, with costs to defendant.

Nelson Sharpe, C. J., and Potter, North, Pead, Butzel, Bushnell, and Edward M. Sharpe, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 N.W. 354, 268 Mich. 374, 1934 Mich. LEXIS 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davenport-v-city-of-detroit-mich-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack