Davall v. Cordero

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. California
DecidedFebruary 7, 2022
Docket3:20-cv-01968
StatusUnknown

This text of Davall v. Cordero (Davall v. Cordero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davall v. Cordero, (S.D. Cal. 2022).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH DAVALL, CDCR #AW-8294, Case No.: 20-cv-1968-JLS-KSC

12 Plaintiff[s], NOTICE AND ORDER MODIFYING 13 v. MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE TO BE HELD VIA 14 A. CORDERO; D. WHITE; WHITMAN, ZOOM AND ISSUING UPDATED

15 PROCEDURES Defendant[s].

17 18 A Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) is scheduled in this matter for March 19 3, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford. Due to the COVID-19 20 public emergency, and because plaintiff is currently incarcerated, no personal appearances 21 are required. Instead, the Court will conduct the MSC by video conference. Counsel for 22 defendant must make all necessary arrangements for plaintiff to participate in the MSC. 23 The following are mandatory guidelines for the parties preparing for the MSC. 24 Absent express permission obtained from this Court, and notwithstanding the pendency 25 of any motion, the parties shall timely comply with the dates and deadlines herein. 26 1. Full Settlement Authority Is Required: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 27 16.1.c.1, all parties, party representatives (including claims adjusters for insured parties), 28 /// 1 and the principal attorney(s) responsible for the litigation must participate in the MSC. 2 This appearance must be made with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into 3 a binding settlement.2 In the case of a corporate entity, an authorized representative of the 4 corporation who is not retained outside counsel must be present and must have 5 discretionary authority to commit the company to pay an amount up to the amount of the 6 plaintiff’s prayer (excluding punitive damage prayers). The purpose of this requirement is 7 to have representatives present who can settle the case during the course of the conference 8 without consulting a superior. 9 Counsel for a government entity may be excused from this requirement so long as 10 the government attorney who participates in the MSC (1) has primary responsibility for 11 handling the case; and (2) may negotiate settlement offers that the attorney is willing to 12 recommend to the government official having ultimate settlement authority. 13 2. Procedure for Zoom Videoconference Appearance: The Court will use its 14 Zoom video conferencing account to host the MSC. If you are unfamiliar with Zoom: 15 Zoom is available on computers through a download on the Zoom website 16 (https://zoom.us/meetings) or on mobile devices through the installation of a free app.3 17

18 1 The attendance requirement includes parties that are indemnified by others. Any 19 deviation from this Order requires prior Court approval. 20 2 Full authority to settle means that the individuals attending the MSC are authorized 21 to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 22 653 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to 23 change the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-486 (D. Ariz. 2003). One of the purposes of requiring a person with unlimited 24 settlement authority to attend the conference is that the person’s view of the case may be 25 altered during the face-to-face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486. Limited or sum certain authority is not adequate. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595-597 26 (8th Cir. 2001). 27 3 Participants are encouraged to use laptops or desktop computers for the video 28 conference, if possible, as mobile devices often offer inferior performance. 1 Joining a Zoom conference does not require creating a Zoom account, but it does require 2 downloading the .exe file (if using a computer) or the app (if using a mobile device). 3 Participants are encouraged to create an account, install Zoom, and familiarize themselves 4 with Zoom in advance of the MSC.4 There is a cost-free option for creating a Zoom 5 account. 6 Before the start of the MSC, the Court will email each participant an invitation to 7 join a Zoom video conference. Participants shall join the video conference by following 8 the ZoomGov Meeting hyperlink in the invitation. Participants who do not have Zoom 9 already installed on their device when they click on the ZoomGov Meeting hyperlink will 10 be prompted to download and install Zoom before proceeding. Zoom may then prompt 11 participants to enter the password included in the invitation. All participants will be placed 12 in a waiting room until the MSC begins. 13 Each participant should plan to join the Zoom video conference at least five minutes 14 before the start of the MSC to ensure that the conference begins on time. The Zoom e- 15 mail invitation may indicate an earlier start time, but the MSC will begin at the time 16 scheduled by the Court. 17 Zoom’s functionalities will allow the Court to conduct the MSC as it ordinarily 18 would conduct an in-person one. The Court will divide participants into separate, 19 confidential sessions, which Zoom calls Breakout Rooms.5 In a Breakout Room, the Court 20 will be able to communicate with participants from a single party in confidence. Breakout 21 Rooms will also allow parties and counsel to communicate confidentially outside the 22 presence of the Court. 23 /// 24

25 26 4 For help getting started with Zoom, visit: https://support.zoom.us/hc/en- us/categories/200101697-Getting-Started. 27

5 For more information on what to expect when participating in a Zoom Breakout 28 1 Since plaintiff is incarcerated, counsel for defendant must make arrangements for 2 plaintiff to participate in the MSC by videoconference. No later than March 24, 2022, 3 counsel for defendant must e-mail to the Court at efile_crawford@casd.uscourts.gov the 4 following information: 5 a. The name and title of each participant, including all parties and party 6 representatives with full settlement authority, claims adjusters for insured 7 defendants, and the primary attorney(s) responsible for the litigation; 8 b. An e-mail address for each participant (and for plaintiff, the appropriate 9 contact at the facility where he currently resides) to receive the Zoom video 10 conference invitation; and 11 c. A telephone number where each participant (and for plaintiff, the 12 appropriate contact at the facility where he currently resides) may be 13 reached so that if technical difficulties arise, the Court will be in a position to 14 proceed telephonically instead of by video conference. 15 Counsel must be responsible for ensuring their clients are able to participate in the 16 MSC. All participants shall display the same level of professionalism during the MSC and 17 be prepared to devote their full attention to the MSC as if they were attending in person 18 (e.g., participants may not be driving or otherwise distracted while speaking to the Court). 19 Because Zoom may quickly deplete the battery of a participant’s device, each participant 20 should ensure that their device is plugged in or that a charging cable is readily available 21 during the video conference. 22 3. Confidential MSC Statements Required: No later than one week before 23 the MSC, each party shall lodge a Confidential MSC Statement by mail or email 24 (efile_crawford@casd.uscourts.gov). The MSC statement shall not exceed five (5) pages, 25 excluding exhibits (and shall not exceed 20 pages including exhibits). These statements 26 are not to be filed on the CM/ECF system or served on other parties. 27 All confidential MSC Statements must include: 28 a. A brief description of the case and the claims and defenses asserted; 1 b.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Davall v. Cordero, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davall-v-cordero-casd-2022.